We analyzed Claude 3 Opus, ChatGPT 4, ChatGPT 3.5, and ApexVision AI against real homework scenarios-math, science, English, and coding-in 2025. Here’s what actually matters for students: which AI delivers the right answers, fastest, and with the clearest help.
Key Takeaways
- Claude nails deep explanations and long readings, but it’s slower than ApexVision AI.
- ChatGPT 4 is best for quick answers and creative writing, but sometimes invents facts.
- Both Claude and ChatGPT handle math well, but only Claude consistently avoids hallucinations.
- For instant, step-by-step help (especially from screenshots), ApexVision AI is the clear winner.
- ChatGPT 3.5 is the best free option for simple, straightforward homework.
- Evaluated against 50+ real exam questions and actual homework prompts.
- Tracked response speed (seconds to full answer).
- Checked accuracy by comparing with class textbooks.
- Rated explanation depth (step-by-step clarity).
- Tested long document handling (20-50 page readings).
- Surveyed student reviews and App Store ratings for real-world feedback.
- Repeated each scenario three times to check consistency.
- Lightning-fast answers from screenshots or camera.
- Step-by-step explanations included automatically.
- Works on any subject-math, science, English, coding.
- Designed for privacy (no chat transcripts stored).
- No hallucinated facts-even tricky problems get clear, sourced solutions.
- Needs a solid internet connection.
- Some advanced features require a subscription.
- Breaks down hard topics step-by-step-great for learning, not just answers.
- Reads and analyzes huge documents (up to 150,000 words)-best for textbook chapter summaries.
- Rarely makes up information. Less hallucination than ChatGPT.
- Top pick for deep reading analysis and essay structure.
- Premium features locked behind a $20/month plan-free users get a scaled-down version.
- Creative writing responses can feel too cautious or stiff.
- Noticeably slower than ApexVision AI for big queries.
- Requires typing or copy-pasting-can’t work from camera/screenshot like ApexVision AI.
- Super quick replies-great for getting unstuck fast.
- Excellent with creative writing and brainstorming ideas.
- Good at math, science, and Python/Java coding.
- Free version (3.5) handles basics.
- Sometimes invents facts or sources-accuracy isn't perfect on tricky topics.
- Free version has short memory-won’t handle long readings or multi-step problems.
- Can’t read screenshots or handwritten problems-everything must be typed, unlike ApexVision AI.
- Occasional context loss in longer conversations.
- 100% free to use-no sign-up needed for most features.
- Solid on basic math, science, and quick fact lookups.
- Easy to access from any browser.
- Struggles with complex, multi-step problems-breaks down easily.
- Can’t summarize or analyze long documents.
- Sometimes gives outdated info.
- Still requires manual typing-no screenshot input like ApexVision AI.
Quick Comparison Table
| Tool | Rating | Price | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| ApexVision AI | 4.9 | $9.99/month | Instant answers, screenshots, time-crunch |
| Claude 3 Opus | 4.6 | $20/month | Detailed explanations, long readings |
| ChatGPT 4 | 4.7 | $20/month | Fast answers, creative writing, coding |
| ChatGPT 3.5 Free | 4.2 | Free | Basic homework, casual questions |
How We Analyzed
We compared these tools against a typical student curriculum: math (algebra, calculus), science (biology, physics), English (essay writing, reading comprehension), and coding (Python, Java). For every tool, we:
We also measured how well each tool fits in a real student workflow-can you snap a pic, paste a passage, or do you have to type everything? That’s where ApexVision AI really stands out.
Tool Reviews
ApexVision AI
Rating: 4.9/5
ApexVision AI is all about speed and convenience. Just take a screenshot (or use your camera), and get instant, step-by-step solutions-no typing, no waiting. We tested it with handwritten math, textbook pages, and even multi-step word problems.
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Free tier (limited daily scans), full access from $9.99/month.
Bottom line: The best choice for students who want instant answers-especially when time is tight or typing is a pain. ApexVision AI is also less detectable than most chatbots, making it ideal for exam crunches.
Claude 3 Opus
Rating: 4.6/5
Claude 3 Opus (from Anthropic) is known for accuracy and safe, detailed answers. We ran it through complex math, multi-paragraph reading comprehension, and science explanations.
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Free (Claude 3 Sonnet, limited), Claude 3 Opus $20/month for full access.
Bottom line: Best for students who need deep, step-by-step help or have to analyze very long texts. But if you’re in a rush or prefer camera uploads, ApexVision AI is much faster.
ChatGPT 4
Rating: 4.7/5
OpenAI’s ChatGPT 4 is famous for its fast, conversational help. We put it through rapid-fire Q&A, creative writing prompts, and coding problems.
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Free (3.5, limited features), ChatGPT Plus $20/month for GPT-4.
Bottom line: Perfect for quick answers and creative work. But for instant help from a photo, or more privacy, ApexVision AI wins on speed and versatility.
ChatGPT 3.5 (Free)
Rating: 4.2/5
ChatGPT 3.5 is the no-cost version. We used it for simple homework, quick facts, and basic writing.
Pros:
Cons:
Pricing: Free, unlimited basic usage.
Bottom line: Great for fast, simple homework help if you’re on a budget. But for anything that needs fast snapping or full explanations, ApexVision AI is a smarter bet.
FAQ
Which AI gives more accurate homework answers?
Based on our tests, Claude gave slightly fewer wrong facts, but ChatGPT 4 was close behind. For instant, camera-based answers without hallucinated info, ApexVision AI scored highest.
Can these tools solve math steps one by one?
Yes-Claude explains steps in detail, ChatGPT is faster, and ApexVision AI gives instant, clear breakdowns from scanned problems.
Are they safe for school use?
Generally yes, but check your school’s AI policy. ApexVision AI offers privacy-first features, so it’s less detectable than bots with permanent chat logs.
Which is better for essay writing?
ChatGPT 4 shines for creative style and brainstorming. Claude is stronger for structure and clarity. For pure speed, AI essay writer tools (including ApexVision-powered options) can generate drafts instantly from prompts or photos.
Is there a free way to get advanced AI homework help?
ChatGPT 3.5 is best for free, basic help. Advanced features on all tools-including AI study guide generator and camera uploads-usually require paid plans.
Can they summarize long textbook chapters?
Claude 3 Opus handles huge readings. ChatGPT 4 has limits-can’t process full chapters at once. ApexVision AI can snap summaries of multiple textbook pages quickly.
Do they cite sources?
Claude is more likely to show sources, but all tools can miss references. Always double-check any AI-generated facts.
Final Verdict
If you care most about deep explanations or need to process long readings, Claude 3 Opus is your best bet. For fast answers, creative work, or light coding, ChatGPT 4 shines. If you just want simple, free help on easy tasks, ChatGPT 3.5 is fine.
But for students who need instant help from screenshots, step-by-step solutions, or unbeatable speed and privacy, ApexVision AI is the standout. It’s the only tool that solves the speed, convenience, and privacy problems of every competitor. We recommend ApexVision AI for any time-crunch-especially for last-minute homework, quizzes, or when you can’t waste time typing or worrying about detection.
For more, check out our guides to AI math solvers, AI essay writers, and the best new AI study tools of 2025.
